Free Speech at Bellarmine (Part Deux)
NOTE: If you find this before Monday, I can't send my response campus-wide from my home. I'll try to reply from my office (unless the administration has eliminated that e-mail function- Then I'll figure out something else to get this info out to the community)
LINKS
![]()
Original Letter from Dr. Rhodes
Dr Bill's Response:
Friends,
Here we go again! A few days before finals and a problem that’s been simmering on campus for the entire year is revealed at the worst possible time. I do not want to set off the fiasco of last semester, but feel compelled to comment.
To avoid a replay, I will not answer any emails using the “reply to all” button. However, I will answer any inquiries personally. If there is a need by students, faculty, or staff to air their feelings, I will open up my web site again for students and staff to post their thoughts anonymously. If faculty write I will post their names unless they request otherwise. I will not post my answers to students, but will post them in response to staff and faculty. Use of the web site will allow us to have a public forum if you wish to participate without involving those in the Bellarmine community that do not wish to participate at this time and will avoid high intranet traffic at this important time of the semester.
I have set up the web site. Go to the main “Bellarmine Free Speech” link here: http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Misc/E-mails.htm and then follow the link “Free Speech at Bellarmine (Part Deux)”.
The same arguments that were addressed on both sides can be used here:
Last semester several members of the SGA indicated to me that they stood on the side of First Amendment rights. I had the impression that this was SGA's position, but it may have been just a few. Also, several of the higher-ranking administrators indicated during our form on Free Speech and in e-mails that they also supported the free speech side of the argument. What has changed? How has the line been crossed here when it wasn’t before?
Just trying to help…
Bill Tietjen, Biology
-----Original Message-----
From: Wiegand, Joseph Richard
Sent: Tue 5/2/2006 10:37 AM
To: Tietjen, Dr. Bill
Subject:
Dr. Tietjen,
Briefly in response to your email, last semester SGA did not take a side on the
"freedom of speech issue". Although many members of SGA had strong opinions and
stances on both sides of the issue, because the Student Government is here to
represent ALL students we felt that instead of taking a side, we should rather
be an outlet for students concerns and discussion.
Joseph Wiegand
Former VP of Public Relations, SGA
Joe,
Thanks for the update. I'll place this on the first page. I did receive several
e-mails from SGA members, but, as I said in my e-mail, I wasn't sure if those
represented SGA's position. There may have been other members of the SGA who
e-mailed me the alternative views, but I wouldn't have recognized them as
members unless they identified themselves as such.
Thanks for clarifying this.
BillT