Biological Effects of Volatile Emissions from Cut Grass
Maria L. Davis* and David L. Robinson, Biology Department, Bellarmine College, Louisville, KY, 40205
Abstract
Current research on the volatile emissions emanating from recently-mowed turf-grass indicates that these gases may have a significant impact on the environment. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect of gaseous emissions from different species on the rate of seed germination. In the first study, dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber) and white snakeroot (Ageratina altissima (L.) King & Robinson [Eupatorium rugosum Houtt.]) seeds were placed into resealable, plastic bags containing the freshly-harvested foliage (cut into approximately 4 cm lengths) from a species of plant that commonly grows in turf. Seeds were treated with the emissions from one of seven plant species: Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Lolium perenne L., Leptochloa fascicularis (Lam.) Gray, Taraxacum officinale Weber, Trifolium repens L., Glechoma hederacea L., or Plantago lanceolata L. Germination rates were examined over a 18-day period, and the foliage-gas treatments that incurred the greatest effects were examined in more detail in a second experiment. In that study, A. altissima seeds were germinated in a replicated trial in the presence of cut foliage from one of four different species (C. dactylon (L.) Pers., T. officinale, T. repens, P. lanceolata) or an experimental control. No statistically significant differences were observed for rate of germination in any of the foliage treatments (including the control). A third experiment was conducted in which the cut foliage was placed in sealed flasks in order to allow the build up of gases from the wounded plants. The gases were then analyzed using gas chromatography. In addition, the effect of these gases on crickets, a common grass-dwelling insect, will also be presented.Introduction
The scent of freshly mowed lawns is well known to many, but one could ask, "What effect does this "smell" have on ecosystems?" Recently published research suggests that gas emissions from cut grass are volatile organic compounds (VOC) that play an important role in the pollution of the troposphere (de Gouw et al., 1999). Some of the gases emitted from cut turf have been identified as oxygenated VOCs such as methanol, acetaldehyde, acetone, and butanone, and C6 oxygenates such as (Z)-3-hexanal, (Z)-3-hexanol, and hexenyl acetate (Kirstine et al., 1998; de Gouw et al., 1999). The purpose of our experiments were to explore the following questions:
Material and Methods
Experiment 1:
The seeds (achenes) of two species were used: Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale
Weber) and White Snakeroot (Ageratina altissima (L.) King & Robinson [Eupatorium
rugosum Houtt.]). The achenes were treated with the gases from one of 6 turf species
from Bellarmine College's campus or a control (cheesecloth only). The turf species used
were:
There were 14 petri dishes used with 100 seeds in each. The achenes were planted onto filter paper with 3 ml of distilled water. Seven of the dishes contained Dandelion seeds and the others held White Snakeroot. All of the leaves (4.5g/treatment) were collected, cut 2 or 3 times and wrapped in cheesecloth. The stapled cheesecloth containers (and a control with no leaves) were placed individually into resealable plastic bags. Each plate, with seeds, was placed into a plastic bag with one of the leaf-treatments and sealed. Germination was assessed 6 days and 18 days after planting. Since this was a preliminary study, no replications were used.
Experiment 2:
White Snakeroot achene germination was examined in this experiment. Four sources of
turfgrass leaf material and one control (cheesecloth only) were used:
For each leaf species 4 petri dishes were used (as replicates) giving a total of 20 dishes (including 4 dishes for the control). The leaves were collected at the same time as the achenes were planted. Dishes were lined with filter paper and 3 ml of deionized water was added to each. The tissue (4.5g) was cut several times and placed (along with a dish of achenes) into a resealable plastic bag. Achenes were allowed to germinate and counted at 5, 10, 15, and 22 days. Statistical comparison was by analysis of variance (SigmaStat v2.0).
Experiment 3:
In this experiment, the gases emitted from the cut grasses were identified using gas
chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS). The GC/MS used was Hewlett Packard 5890 HP-5ms.
The column was 5%(crosslinked)-MeSILOXANE 30 meters, .25mm I.D. and 3000C max.
Helium was used as the carrier flow at 1 cc/min. The oven was set at room temp (25°C),
and the injection port was set at 100°C. Three species of plants were used:
Four grams of leaves from each species were cut 2 or 3 times and placed into 250ml Erlenmeyer flasks. One flask, the control, contained only air and a few drops of water. Each of the other 6 flasks contained the sample of leaves from one species. Each flask was sealed with a rubber stopper and 3 were placed under a light, while the other 3 flasks were placed in the dark. The flasks were allowed to sit for 5 days. Known gases were injected into the GC-MS as standards. They were:
The experimental samples were then collected (by inserting a syringe through the rubber stopper) and injected the gas into the GC-MS.
Experiment 4:
The effect of vegetative gas emissions on crickets (Order Orthoptera) was also examined.
Sixteen crickets were purchased from a local pet store to ensure that the insects were all
of the same species and grown in the same environment. Each treatment was replicated 4
times (using 16 jars, with 4 as a control). Three turfgrass species were used as sources
of gas:
The leaves were collected (4.0g) and cut 2 or 3 times, wrapped in cheesecloth, and stapled. Each leaf unit was placed into one of twelve glass jars. One cricket was placed into each of the jars. The experimental control contained one cricket with cheesecloth only. A lid, consisting of doubled cheesecloth and plastic wrap with holes, was placed over the mouth of the jars to seal in the gases as much as possible, while still allowing some air transfer for the insects. The crickets were observed 1 or 2 times a day for 6 days. Each time the distance the crickets were from the cheesecloth-treatment was measured.
Results
Figure 1

Figure 2

Experiment 1:
Figure 3
Experiment 2:
Experiment 3:
Table 1:
Table 1.
Time Separation of Known Gases |
||
Known Gas |
Known (min) |
Air (min) |
Acetone |
1.471 |
1.182 |
Methanol |
1.262 |
1.169 |
Acetaldehyde |
2.088 |
1.18 |
Ethanol |
1.396 |
1.198 |
Butanone |
2.088 |
1.196 |
Table 2 and 3:
Table 2.
Turf Species in Dark |
||||
Turf Species |
CO2 |
O2 |
N2 |
CH4 |
Dandelion |
Abundance: 2.5E+6 Mass: 44 |
Not Detected | Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Abundance: 1.5E+6 Mass: 16 |
Bermuda |
Abundance: 3.0E+6 Mass: 44 |
Abundance: 0.5E +6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Abundance: 1.0E+6 Mass: 16 |
Plantain |
Abundance: 4.0E +6 Mass: 44 |
Abundance: 0.2E +6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Abundance: 1.0E+6 Mass: 16 |
Control |
Not Detected | Abundance: 2.5E+ 6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Not Detected |
Table 3.
Turf Species in Light |
||||
Plants |
CO2 |
O2 |
N2 |
CH4 |
Dandelion |
Abundance: 2.8E+6 Mass: 44 |
Abundance: 0.5E+6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Abundance: 0.8E+6 Mass: 16 |
Bermuda |
Abundance: 0.5E+6 Mass: 44 |
Abundance: 1.0E+6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Abundance: 0.5E+6 Mass: 16 |
Plantain |
Abundance: 0.2E+6 Mass: 44 |
Abundance: 1.5E+6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Abundance: 0.8E+6 Mass: 16 |
Control |
Not Detected | Abundance: 2.5E+6 Mass: 32 |
Abundance: 6.0E +6 Mass: 28 |
Not Detected |
Experiment 4:
Table 4:
Table 4:
Cricket distance away from treatment (cm)
Jar |
Day 1 (AM) |
Day 1 (PM) |
Day 2 (AM) |
Day 2 (PM) |
Day 3 (AM) |
Day 3 (PM) |
Day 4 |
Day 5 |
D1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deceased |
D2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
D3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
14 |
deceased |
deceased |
D4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
B2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deceased |
deceased |
deceased |
deceased |
P1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deceased |
deceased |
deceased |
deceased |
P2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deceased |
deceased |
P3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deceased |
deceased |
P4 |
16 |
16 |
0 |
14 |
12 |
deceased |
deceased |
deceased |
C1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
12 |
deceased |
deceased |
deceased |
C2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
3 |
deceased | deceased |
C3 |
11 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
C4 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
Conclusions
Summary:
We did not detect the type of gases (VOCs) emitted from leaves that have been reported
previously. This may be due to our use of enclosed, stationary systems rather than
circulating ones. In our studies, neither plant growth (achene germination) nor animal
behavior (Cricket movement) was negatively affected by the presence of wounded leaves. In
fact, the Crickets appeared to prefer the experimental treatments!
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the following people for their help with this study:
Sources
DeGouw, JA, CJ Howard, TG Custer and R Fall. 1999. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from cut grass and clover are enhanced during the drying process. Geophysical Research Letters 26: 811-814.
Kirstine, W, I Galbally, Y Ye and M Hooper. 1998. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (primarily oxygenated species) from pasture. Journal of Geophysical Research 103: 10,605-10,619.