Earthworm Distribution and Soil Microbiology
Chris Pickering
Anne Bruner
Ecology, Fall 1998
PURPOSE:
The purpose of our experiment was to determine the relationship between soil microbiology (the absence or presence of microbes as food sources) and the absence or presence of earthworms. Another goal was to determine the most suitable habitat for earthworm populations, i.e. compost piles, grassy areas, or forest floors.
METHODS:
There were two main components of our project: the collection of earthworms from various sites, and the analysis of microbes found at each site.
Methods of Earthworm Collection:
Volumes of soil 10 cm X 10cm from specific areas were examined for the presence of earthworms. The collection of specimens occurred on 9 October 1998 from 2-4 PM. The day was partly cloudy and approximately 68o F. Fourteen sites were examined, soil samples were taken, and the number of specimens per site was recorded.
The central area in question was a compost pile of yard debris that was in constant use throughout the summer and fall seasons. The debris included leaves, mulch, top soil, and vegetation scraps. This compost pile was bordered by a small hardwood forest to the northeast and south and by open, manicured grass to the west.
Compost pile sites:
Site A) middle of the compost pile, next to site B
Site B) middle of the compost pile, next to site A
Site C) 10 cm underneath site B
Site D) far north edge of compost pile
Site E) far south edge of compost pile
Site F) dirt pile, northern border of compost pile
Grassy area sites:
Site G) under a large hardwood tree in the middle of the grassy area
Site H) open, well-manicured grass
Site I) under a vine of ivy in a grassy, open space
Site J) 10 cm underneath site I
Forest floor sites:
Site K) under a log on the periphery of the forest area, next to site L
Site L) under a long on the periphery of the forest area, next to site K
Site M) periphery of forest floor
Site N) forest floor
Methods of Microbe Analysis:
One gram of each soil sample was added to 20 mL of deionized water in a 50 mL beaker, and mixed for one minute with a glass stirring rod. An SAB (fungal and bacterial medium) and an EMB (bacterial medium) plate were each streaked using a pre0measured 0.001 mL inoculating loop.
The plates were placed in an incubator at 26o C for 45 hours. The plates were then examined for growth, and each distinguishable species was described.
RESULTS:
SAB Colony Morphology:
| colony form | margin forms | colony elevation | colony color | colony appearance | |
| Species 1 | filamentous | filamentous | flat | clear (off-white) | not shiny |
| Species 2 | circular | entire | convex | clear (off-white) | shiny |
| Species 3 | circular | entire | convex | yellow | shiny |
| Species 4 | filamentous | filamentous | convex | white w/black spores | mold, 4 cm radius |
| Species 5 | filamentous | filamentous | umbonate | yellow center, white edges | not shiny |
| Species 6 | circular | curled | raised | clear (off-white) | not shiny |
| Species 7 | filamentous | filamentous | umbonate | white with white spots | not shiny |
EMB Colony Morphology:
| colony form | margin forms | colony elevation | colony color | colony appearance | |
| Species 1 | filamentous | filamentous | flat | clear | not shiny |
| Species 2 | circular | entire | convex | clear | shiny |
| Species 3 | irregular | undulate | raised | pink, opaque | shiny |
| Species 4 | circular | entire | raised | clear, but dark brown spot in center | shiny |
| Species 5 | irregular | lobate | raised | bright pink | shiny |
| Species 6 | circular | entire | Convex | white/gray in center with dark brown edges | shiny |
| Species 7 | circular | entire | Raised | dark pink, reflects metallic shine | shiny |
| Species 8 | circular | entire | Convex | bright metallic green | very shiny |
| Species 9 | circular | entire | Convex | royal blue | shiny |
| Species 10 | circular | entire | Convex | yellowish color | shiny |
Microbial Species Found at Each Site:
| SAB PLATES | |||||||||||
Sample |
Total # colonies |
Species 1 |
Species 2 |
Species 3 |
Species 4 |
Species 5 |
Species 6 |
Species 7 |
|||
A |
49 |
0 |
47 (95.92 %) |
0 |
2 (4.08 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
B |
34 |
0 |
33 (97.06 %) |
0 |
1 (2.94 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
C |
30 |
1 (3.33 %) |
28 (93.33 %) |
1 (3.33 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
D |
34 |
4 (11.76 %) |
29 (85.29 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 (2.94 %) |
0 |
|||
E |
65 |
10 (15.38 %) |
55 (84.62 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
F |
55 |
3 (5.45 %) |
50 (90.91 %) |
2 (3.64 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
G |
27 |
9 (33.33 %) |
15 (55.56 %) |
0 |
3 (11.11 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
H |
40 |
2 (5.00 %) |
38 (95.00 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
I |
55 |
19 (34.55 %) |
35 (63.64 %) |
1 (1.82 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
J |
9 |
0 |
9 (100 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
K |
35 |
2 (5.71 %) |
31 (88.57 %) |
1 (2.85 %) |
0 |
1 (2.85 %) |
0 |
0 |
|||
L |
18 |
2 (11.11 %) |
15 (83.33 %) |
1 (5.56 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
M |
29 |
2 (6.90 %) |
24 (82.76 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 (10.34 %) |
|||
N |
25 |
4 (16.00 %) |
21 (84.00 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
| EMB PLATES | |||||||||||
Sample |
Total # colonies |
Species 1 |
Species 2 |
Species 3 |
Species 4 |
Species 5 |
Species 6 |
Species 7 |
Species 8 |
Species 9 |
Species 10 |
A |
49 |
1 (2.04 %) |
15 (30.61 %) |
0 |
5 (10.20 %) |
2 (4.08 %) |
26 (53.07 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
53 |
0 |
50 (94.34 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 (5.66 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
C |
10 |
0 |
5 (50.00 %) |
2 (20.00 %) |
1 (10.00 %) |
0 |
1(10.00 %) |
1 (10.00 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
E |
23 |
6 (26.09 %) |
5 (21.74 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 (47.83 %) |
1 (4.35 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
F |
26 |
2 (7.69 %) |
24 (92.31 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
G |
26 |
2 (7.69 %) |
18 (69.23 %) |
0 |
1 (3.85 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 (19.23 %) |
H |
1 |
1 (100.00 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
I |
39 |
4 (10.26 %) |
35 (89.74 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
J |
1 |
1 (100.00 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
K |
28 |
2 (7.14 %) |
23 (82.14 %) |
0 |
1 (3.57 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 (3.57 %) |
1 (3.57 %) |
0 |
L |
9 |
1 (11.11 %) |
5 (55.55 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 (33.33 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
M |
9 |
2 (22.22 %) |
7 (77.77 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
1 (20.00 %) |
0 |
2 (40.00 %) |
2 (40.00 %) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Food Availability in Compost Sites:
Sample |
# of Specimens |
Total # of Colonies |
A |
12 |
98 |
B |
11 |
87 |
C |
3 |
40 |
D |
1 |
34 |
E |
3 |
85 |
F |
3 |
81 |
| Average # of Specimens = | 5.5 | |
| Average # of Colonies per Site = | 70.83333333 | |
Food Availability in Grassy Areas:
Sample |
# of Specimens |
Total # of Colonies |
G |
3 |
53 |
H |
1 |
41 |
I |
9 |
94 |
J |
0 |
10 |
| Average # of Specimens = | 3.25 | |
| Average # of Colonies per Site = | 49.5 | |
Food Availability on Forest Floor:
Sample |
# of Specimens |
Total # of Colonies |
|
K |
1 |
63 |
|
L |
2 |
27 |
|
M |
0 |
38 |
|
N |
1 |
30 |
|
| Average # of Specimens = | 1 | ||
| Average # of Colonies per Site = | 39.5 | ||
CONCLUSIONS:
AREA |
Avg. # specimens |
Avg. # Colonies |
Compost |
5.5 |
70.8 |
Grassy |
3.25 |
49.5 |
Forest Floor |
1 |
39.5 |
According to the above numerical data, a greater number of specimens can be found in areas with a larger food supply.
We feel that the most suitable habitat for earthworms would be a compost pile made up of leaves, mulch, top soil, and vegetation scraps. This area should also be free from direct sunlight, as to prevent rapid desiccation and increase the habitats suitability.